six sources in your diagram
five branches, none of which create anything
What the colours say
We built the intelligence. We did not build the execution.
The diagram splits cleanly at Generate Action Brief. Above it — collect, normalize, dedupe, cluster, classify, score, gate — is almost entirely built. Below it — route to a team, create a task, notify, dashboard — is almost entirely missing.
That isn't a random scatter of gaps. It is precisely your §2 split: Workflow A exists, Workflow B does not. The system can tell you what to do and write the first draft. It cannot yet put that in anyone's queue.
Everything above the seam is machinery that only had to satisfy itself — data in, score out. Everything below it needs a decision from a person: which channel the digest lands in, which task system owns the work, who accepts the SLA. Those decisions are still open, so the branches were never built.
It would have been possible to build them against guesses. That would have produced five task-creation branches pointed at a tool nobody agreed to use.
Two things, in order. One: name the digest channel — one word, open since 9 July. That unlocks the move to a permanent home, without which none of the routing matters because nothing runs unattended. Two: agree the task system, and the five branches become roughly a day of work each, because the classification that feeds them already exists and is already correct.
The Content Intelligence box is separate and worth doing regardless — it sits above the seam, needs no decision from anyone, and is the step you yourself called the brief teams actually need.